Border Policy Trips Up Senate Amid Rush To Pass $1.7 Trillion Spending Bill

At issue is a proposed amendment from Senator Lee of Utah seeking to extend pandemic-era restrictions on asylum seekers at the border, also referred to as Title 42.

AP/J. Scott Applewhite
Senator Schumer at the Capitol on December 21, 2022. AP/J. Scott Applewhite

WASHINGTON — Momentum toward passing a $1.7 trillion government funding bill with more aid for Ukraine slowed considerably Wednesday as lawmakers struggled to reach an agreement on amendments needed to get to a final vote and avoid a partial government shutdown at midnight Friday.

Senator Schumer said the Senate was making progress, but lawmakers exited the chamber late in the evening looking glum and talking of a standoff.

“This bill is hanging by a thread,” said Senator Coons of Delaware.

At issue is a proposed amendment from Senator Lee of Utah seeking to extend pandemic-era restrictions on asylum seekers at the border, also referred to as Title 42.

“Senator Schumer doesn’t want to have a vote on Title 42 because he presumably knows it will pass,” Senator Romney said. But the House won’t go along, he said, and “everything falls apart.”

The impasse came just hours after President Zelensky sought to assure lawmakers during a joint meeting of Congress that the aid the U.S. is providing was much appreciated and could “speed up our victory.” 

He projected confidence throughout and even told lawmakers in his closing: “Merry Christmas and a happy victorious New Year.”

“Your money is not charity. It’s an investment in the global security and democracy that we handle in the most responsible way,” Mr. Zelensky said.

The measure includes $44.9 billion in emergency assistance to Ukraine and NATO allies, above even President Biden’s request, and ensures that funding flows to the war effort for months to come. 

The measure would also boost American defense spending by about 10 percent to $858 billion, addressing concerns from some lawmakers that more investment in the nation’s military is needed to ensure national security.

Mr. Schumer’s hope was that the chamber would approve the bill as soon as Wednesday night, but several lawmakers exited the chamber saying they didn’t expect any more votes that night. 

Once the Senate votes, the House will then have to take it up and pass the measure before midnight Friday to avoid a partial-government shutdown.

Senator Stabenow emerged from a late-night meeting in Mr. Schumer’s office saying she was optimistic “about putting together a path” that would lead to the bill’s passage in the Senate on Thursday.

Mr. Schumer and Senator McConnell took to the floor Wednesday morning urging colleagues to vote for the measure, though they emphasized different priorities.

Mr. Schumer said the worst thing Congress could do now is give President Putin any signal that America was wavering in its commitment to defend Ukraine.

He doubled down on that message in the evening, saying he had just met with Mr. Zelensky.

“He made it clear that without this aid package, the Ukrainians will be in real trouble and could even lose the war,” Mr. Schumer said. “So that makes the urgency of getting this legislation done all the more important.”

Mr. McConnell is facing pushback from many Republicans who don’t support the spending bill and resent being forced to vote on such a massive package with so little time before a potential shutdown and the Christmas holiday. 

He highlighted the bill’s spending boost for defense and said that non-defense spending, when excluding a big boost for veterans health care, would increase below the rate of inflation.

“If Republicans controlled this chamber, we would have handled the appropriations process entirely differently from top to bottom,” Mr. McConnell said. “But given the reality of where we stand today, senators have two options this week, just two: we will either give our Armed Forces the resources and the certainty that they need, or we will deny it to them.”

The bill, which runs for 4,155 pages, includes about $772.5 billion for non-defense, discretionary programs and $858 billion for defense. It would finance federal agencies through September.

Lawmakers worked to stuff as many priorities as they could into the sprawling package, likely the last major bill of the current Congress. That includes $27 billion in disaster funding to help communities recovering from disasters and extreme weather events as well as an overhaul of federal election law that aims to prevent any future presidents or presidential candidates from trying to overturn an election.

The bipartisan electoral overhaul was a direct response to President Trump’s efforts to convince Republican lawmakers and Vice President Pence to object to the certification of the presidential election results on January 6, 2021.

The spending bill also contains scores of policy changes that lawmakers worked furiously to include to avoid having to start over in the new Congress next year.

Examples include a provision from Senator Hawley, to ban TikTok on government cell phones due to security concerns. 

Another provision supported by the Maine delegation was added to aid the state’s lobster and Jonah crab fisheries, delaying regulations proposed to help save endangered North Atlantic right whales. 

On the health care front, the bill requires states to keep children enrolled in Medicaid on coverage for at least a year, which advocates say increases access to preventative care.

However, millions who enrolled in the health care program for low-income Americans could start to lose coverage on April 1 because the bill sunsets a requirement of the Covid public health emergency that prohibited states from booting people off Medicaid.

The bill also provides roughly $15.3 billion for more than 7,200 projects that lawmakers sought for their home states and districts. Under revamped rules for community project funding, also referred to as earmarks, lawmakers must post their requests online and attest they have no financial interest in the projects. Still, many fiscal conservatives criticize the earmarking as leading to unnecessary spending.

House Republicans, including Representative Kevin McCarthy, likely the next speaker of the House, are encouraging their colleagues in the Senate to only support a short-term extension. 

That way, they would have more ability to shape the legislation. Mr. McCarthy spoke to senators during their caucus lunch Wednesday. A notice sent by GOP leadership to House members urged them to vote against the measure when it comes to the House.

“This deal is designed to sideline the incoming Republican House Majority by extending many programs for multiple years and providing large funding increases for Democrat priorities on top of the exorbitant spending that has already been appropriated this year,” the notice said.

Associated Press


The New York Sun

© 2024 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used.

The New York Sun

Sign in or  create a free account

By continuing you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use